Review of V/H/S: Viral (2014) by David B — 13 Feb 2016
After much white noise and other loud sounds along with annoying picture fluctuations, the individual horror segments begin. None of them are impressive. I recognize that it's part of the great horror tradition to beat a marketable name into the ground, but that doesn't make up for the disappointment.
Out the three, this is the worst, it's problem lies is it's own demise, if you've seen the first two then you'll know what to expect, except this one isn't shocking nor fun to watch.
Good twist at the end and the young cast are good but it lacks spice from a weak script. However, it does end an interesting trilogy but I'd stick with the bloody gory second film and the first film that shocked the shaky cam-doc genre.
One need go no further than the film's first segment to grasp how little interest the latest entry in the anthology series has in generating chills from the lo-fi.
This review of V/H/S: Viral (2014) was written by David B on 13 Feb 2016.
V/H/S: Viral has generally received negative reviews.
Was this review helpful?
