Review of Rachel, Rachel (1968) by George T — 29 Apr 2012
It is noticeable that "Rachel, Rachel" has fallen into the world of Best Picture nominees forgotten from the 494 that have been nominated so far up to the 84th Academy Awards and for good reason.
Pretty ridiculous, super pretentious movie for which Rachel (Joanne Woodward) is a single school teacher, who begins to get hormones and wants change. She obviously needs a man in her life. Hard to believe that anyone would want her in her life based on this performance, including director and husband and actor (not in this film, probably a wise choice), Paul Newman.
Silly, stupid, and idiotic sequences that add to the bad films released from 1968 and nominated for Best Picture. Everything is forgettable, especially the performances, some of which were nominated, like Woodward's.
This review of Rachel, Rachel (1968) was written by George T on 29 Apr 2012.
Rachel, Rachel has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
