When the cast comes off his once broken arm, a 12-year-old boy can throw a 100-mile-an-hour fastball, and the Chicago Cubs want him as their new pitcher.
Rookie of the Year has generally received mixed reviews.
Perhaps you were looking for:
Cinafilm features reviews from top contributing critics and users.
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
By Roger Ebert (5,190) for Chicago Sun-Times (7,580) on 18 Dec 2017
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
By Randy White (41) for Common Sense Media (4,943) on 02 Jan 2011
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
By Hollis Chacona (53) for Austin Chronicle (7,653) on 10 Dec 1995
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
By Jeff B (2,998) on 21 Jan 2010
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
By David F (1,889) on 28 Jun 2007
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
By Robert I (1,833) on 02 Nov 2009
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
By Kevin P (1,697) on 07 Oct 2008
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
By David K (1,644) on 09 Oct 2007
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
By Josh B (1,074) on 25 Jun 2007
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
By Anthony A (656) on 24 Jul 2007
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
Review of Rookie of the Year (1993)
By Melissa M (577) on 19 Apr 2008
More About This Page
Rookie of the Year was released in 1993 and has generally received mixed reviews.
Online reviewers have written 437 reviews, giving Rookie of the Year (1993) an average rating of 56%.
Overall, cinema-goers marginally prefer the movie, giving it an average score of 71%, compared to film critics, who gave it a slightly lower average score of 63%.
With a score of 56%, Rookie of the Year is roughly the same as the average Cinafilm score for movies made in 1993, which stands at 58%.
Other movies from 1993 with similar scores include films like We're Back! A Dinosaur's Story and The Dark Half.
Popular Movies Right Now
