Review of Chloe and Theo (2015) by Daniel M. Gold for New York Times — 02 Sep 2015
Chloe & Theo is surprisingly amateurish in concept and execution. There’s a line between a narrative that’s deliberately simple and one that’s painfully childish, and it’s not all that fine.
But it’s one Chloe & Theo crosses repeatedly.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of Chloe and Theo (2015) was written by Daniel M. Gold and published by New York Times on 02 Sep 2015.
Chloe and Theo has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
