Review of River of Grass (1995) by Stephen Holden for The New York Times — 03 Apr 2012
It is wonderful at conveying a sense of suffocating ennui. Too wonderful, since the story is so sketchily told and the dialogue is so fragmentary that it doesn't quite cohere. The characters remain hazy ciphers in the torpid atmosphere of a place you'll never want to visit.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of River of Grass (1995) was written by Stephen Holden and published by The New York Times on 03 Apr 2012.
River of Grass has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
